BoardSignals.ai

The framework

The Threat Compass

Eight bearings a board must keep in view. Select a bearing to see what it covers, why boards miss it, and what to ask.

NState actorsNEInsidersECyberSESupply chainSNarrativeSWRegulatoryWPeople & travelNWBoard itself

Bearing NW

Board Blind Spots

Gaps in how the board learns about threats: information that stops at management, conflicted executives, and missing expertise.

Why boards miss it

Boards assume material threats will be escalated to them. When the concern involves the people who control the information flow, it often is not. The press, regulators, or a whistleblower become the alarm instead.

Red flags

  • The board learns of material matters from the media
  • All threat information flows through the CEO
  • No director with security or intelligence experience
  • Executive sessions rarely include the CISO, CSO, or GC alone

Questions for the board

  1. What is the last material risk we learned about from outside the company?
  2. Can our security leaders reach an independent director without going through the CEO?
  3. Do we have the expertise to challenge management on security matters?
  4. If a government had concerns about one of us, who would they call?

What individual directors should do

  • →Hold regular executive sessions with security, legal, and audit leaders without the CEO
  • →Ask 'what are we not being told?' as a standing question
  • →Invest in your own security literacy; it is now a core director competency